<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hack Of The Day: C++ Class Method Pointers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://intermediaware.com/blog/hack-of-the-day-c-class-method-pointers/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://intermediaware.com/blog/hack-of-the-day-c-class-method-pointers</link>
	<description>indie video game developer blgo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 04:48:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Urfoex</title>
		<link>http://intermediaware.com/blog/hack-of-the-day-c-class-method-pointers#comment-963</link>
		<dc:creator>Urfoex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 09:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intermediaware.com/blog/?p=247#comment-963</guid>
		<description>New function objects are looking better I think:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B0x#Polymorphic_wrappers_for_function_objects


Old school the using variant looks also kind of neat:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B0x#Alias_templates</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New function objects are looking better I think:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B0x#Polymorphic_wrappers_for_function_objects" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B0x#Polymorphic_wrappers_for_function_objects</a></p>
<p>Old school the using variant looks also kind of neat:<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B0x#Alias_templates" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B0x#Alias_templates</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Wonko</title>
		<link>http://intermediaware.com/blog/hack-of-the-day-c-class-method-pointers#comment-957</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Wonko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 19:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intermediaware.com/blog/?p=247#comment-957</guid>
		<description>Yeah, the example&#039;s much better now. Good luck with your current project. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the example&#8217;s much better now. Good luck with your current project. <img src='http://intermediaware.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://intermediaware.com/blog/hack-of-the-day-c-class-method-pointers#comment-954</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 19:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intermediaware.com/blog/?p=247#comment-954</guid>
		<description>@Mr.Wonko:  Thanks for your example, but code doesn&#039;t work well with in the comments of my wordpress blog. I cleaned up the example source a little bit (I just copied, pasted and edited it on the fly from a current project I&#039;m working on).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mr.Wonko:  Thanks for your example, but code doesn&#8217;t work well with in the comments of my wordpress blog. I cleaned up the example source a little bit (I just copied, pasted and edited it on the fly from a current project I&#8217;m working on).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Wonko</title>
		<link>http://intermediaware.com/blog/hack-of-the-day-c-class-method-pointers#comment-952</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Wonko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 19:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intermediaware.com/blog/?p=247#comment-952</guid>
		<description>Class method pointers... Nothing special really, how&#039;s that a hack? Useful, of course, and good to know, but a hack? That&#039;s more like overloading the comma or something. And wouldn&#039;t a simpler example suffice?

And why do you use new here? You gain nothing but have to remember to call delete (which you don&#039;t), or do you?

Man, I always seem overly critical... Sorry about that. I&#039;m really just trying to help. Anyway, some simpler code showcasing class method pointers:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Class method pointers&#8230; Nothing special really, how&#8217;s that a hack? Useful, of course, and good to know, but a hack? That&#8217;s more like overloading the comma or something. And wouldn&#8217;t a simpler example suffice?</p>
<p>And why do you use new here? You gain nothing but have to remember to call delete (which you don&#8217;t), or do you?</p>
<p>Man, I always seem overly critical&#8230; Sorry about that. I&#8217;m really just trying to help. Anyway, some simpler code showcasing class method pointers:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
